Brain Teaser (look up the bold words in the definitions list to expand the concept)
The Path from Virtual Conception to Reality...
In the chamber of darkness, which is the matrix and androgynous place, the mind becomes conscious. Within this mind a spark is released which causes the mind to perceive an archetype. This archetype stimulates an excitement which creates a potential. This potential produces an intent which stirs an appetite and requires the formation of a code. The code becomes a pathway which develops into a sequence of thought that takes the form of a construct. This construct envisions a virtual reality that reaches a climax and eventually births into a reality if:
THERE ARE NO PARAMETERS AND MARGINS SET ON THE POTENTIAL.
Definitions:
Matrix: a situation or set of circumstances that allows or encourages the origin, development, or growth of something: the womb.
Androgynous: blending masculine and feminine.
Mind: seat of thought and memory.
Spark: something that activates: a factor that acts as a stimulant, inspiration, or catalyst.
Archetype: image from the collective unconscious: original model.
Excitement: arouse an emotion. In physics: raise a particle to a higher energy level.
Potential: possible but not yet realized, capacity for future development or achievement.
Intent: plan or purpose.
Appetite: strong desire or craving for something.
Code: system of letters, numbers, or symbols into which language is converted to allow information to be communicated.
Pathway: a path or route: sequence of reactions.
Sequence: a continuous or connected series.
Construct: create something in the mind as a result of systematic thought.
Virtual: being something in effect even if not in reality or not conforming to the generally accepted definition of the term reality.
Reality: real existence.
Climax: key moment: the most exciting or important moment or point.
Parameters: limiting factor: a fact or circumstance that restricts how something is or can be done.
Margins: outer edge: limit: boundary indicating the limit beyond which something should not go or below which something should not fall.
Potential: possible but not yet realized: the capacity for future development or achievement.
In the chamber of darkness, which is the matrix and androgynous place, the mind becomes conscious. Within this mind a spark is released which causes the mind to perceive an archetype. This archetype stimulates an excitement which creates a potential. This potential produces an intent which stirs an appetite and requires the formation of a code. The code becomes a pathway which develops into a sequence of thought that takes the form of a construct. This construct envisions a virtual reality that reaches a climax and eventually births into a reality if:
THERE ARE NO PARAMETERS AND MARGINS SET ON THE POTENTIAL.
Definitions:
Matrix: a situation or set of circumstances that allows or encourages the origin, development, or growth of something: the womb.
Androgynous: blending masculine and feminine.
Mind: seat of thought and memory.
Spark: something that activates: a factor that acts as a stimulant, inspiration, or catalyst.
Archetype: image from the collective unconscious: original model.
Excitement: arouse an emotion. In physics: raise a particle to a higher energy level.
Potential: possible but not yet realized, capacity for future development or achievement.
Intent: plan or purpose.
Appetite: strong desire or craving for something.
Code: system of letters, numbers, or symbols into which language is converted to allow information to be communicated.
Pathway: a path or route: sequence of reactions.
Sequence: a continuous or connected series.
Construct: create something in the mind as a result of systematic thought.
Virtual: being something in effect even if not in reality or not conforming to the generally accepted definition of the term reality.
Reality: real existence.
Climax: key moment: the most exciting or important moment or point.
Parameters: limiting factor: a fact or circumstance that restricts how something is or can be done.
Margins: outer edge: limit: boundary indicating the limit beyond which something should not go or below which something should not fall.
Potential: possible but not yet realized: the capacity for future development or achievement.
The Serpent in the Garden and on the Pole
There is much to be learned when the full essence of understanding associated with the serpent in the garden is realized. There are many levels of truth regarding the teachings associated with this serpent. It is the purpose of this study to add another dimension to our understanding.
The serpent is also depicted as a snake as in the picture.
The Strong’s Concordance defines the word “serpent” as “a snake from its hiss.” So the serpent or snake in the garden is recognizable because of a certain “sound.” The Webster’s Dictionary defines a hiss as an expression of scorn or contempt. The word “serpent” comes from a root word meaning to prognosticate or foretell. The word prognosis is derived from the word prognosticate. Merging these definitions allows us to see that the hiss of the serpent is actually a prognosis of contempt for our future. Doom and gloom prophesies far outnumber prophesies that proclaim LIFE, WHOLENESS, and RECONCILIATION for ALL.
The serpent is also depicted as a snake as in the picture.
The Strong’s Concordance defines the word “serpent” as “a snake from its hiss.” So the serpent or snake in the garden is recognizable because of a certain “sound.” The Webster’s Dictionary defines a hiss as an expression of scorn or contempt. The word “serpent” comes from a root word meaning to prognosticate or foretell. The word prognosis is derived from the word prognosticate. Merging these definitions allows us to see that the hiss of the serpent is actually a prognosis of contempt for our future. Doom and gloom prophesies far outnumber prophesies that proclaim LIFE, WHOLENESS, and RECONCILIATION for ALL.
Leaving the definition of the serpent let us now look at something that seems quite remote from what we are studying. Let’s look at sound or frequency. It looks very similar to the picture of the snake!
We live in a sea of energy; and energy is movement. Even our thoughts are a form of energy. An electroencephalogram is an instrument that actually measures levels of brain frequency.
We can all relate to experiencing thoughts that uplift and thoughts that depress. We can all relate to hearing music that infuses us with life and music that we can’t wait to turn off.
It is well known that there are certain frequencies played at certain volumes which will harm the physical body. Following this logic it is easy to understand that there are also certain thoughts, (because even thoughts are frequencies) that bring discord to the triune man (spirit, soul, body).
Romans 1:21 speaks about futile thoughts that darken the heart, and in Matthew 12:34 we are told that “out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks.” For the mouth to speak the “abundance of the heart” these “thoughts” must pass through the mind.
We live in a sea of energy; and energy is movement. Even our thoughts are a form of energy. An electroencephalogram is an instrument that actually measures levels of brain frequency.
We can all relate to experiencing thoughts that uplift and thoughts that depress. We can all relate to hearing music that infuses us with life and music that we can’t wait to turn off.
It is well known that there are certain frequencies played at certain volumes which will harm the physical body. Following this logic it is easy to understand that there are also certain thoughts, (because even thoughts are frequencies) that bring discord to the triune man (spirit, soul, body).
Romans 1:21 speaks about futile thoughts that darken the heart, and in Matthew 12:34 we are told that “out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks.” For the mouth to speak the “abundance of the heart” these “thoughts” must pass through the mind.
There is actually a part of our brain that is called the reptilian brain. But we'll save that for another study.
With the information we have gleaned thus far, let’s take another look at what happened in the garden. From previous teaching we understand that the separation of the woman from the man was a separation of energies or frequencies. The female principle (frequency) is separated out from the male principle (frequency) to allow for interaction between the two principles, but always in unity or oneness. It is also known that these principles or energies are within each of us, i.e. yang/yin, drive/receptivity, intellect/emotions, etc.
Returning to the garden we realize that the feminine principle entertained a thought (frequency) that manifested as an intent to receive something that she believed she was lacking in…wisdom. The moment she entertained the thought of lack is the moment she “fell” into the lower dimension of illusion. The Illusion of Lack. She forgot that she was an exact image of God.
Notice that later when the Lord God walked in the garden Adam and his wife heard his SOUND but they hid themselves. They hid because they were now living in the realm of duality. In that realm there are always opposites. Adam now saw himself as separate from his wife; no longer one flesh. When questioned about eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (duality) he replied, “The woman whom You gave to be with me…etc.” He now sees himself as separate from her and tries to place blame. The two principles (frequencies) are now inharmonious.
It is important to realize that we are not talking about a literal garden, but the garden of our mind. The scripture reveals that we are God’s garden and Christ is the husbandman. Disharmony came through the first Adam but harmony came through the second Adam, who restored the remembrance of Christhood to everyone… each in his/her own time. All the fragments are gathered so that nothing is lost… only forgotten for a season.
Now let’s look at the serpent held up on a pole in the wilderness. In Numbers 21 we see the Israelites journeying by the Way of the Red Sea and becoming impatient and discouraged. It is interesting to note that the color red is associated with the base chakra or the survival instinct. When this instinct is separated unto itself and not balanced by the other chakras it is very selfish, fearful, and lustful.
The Israelites now began to speak against God and Moses and fear that they were going to die in the wilderness. Remember, previously, we learned that the sound of the serpent was a hiss, and that meant to entertain thoughts of contempt or scorn for the future. Because of their contempt fiery serpents were sent among them. Eventually though, they repented (changed their minds) and ask that the serpents be taken from them. Moses was then instructed by the Lord to “make a fiery serpent, and set it on a pole; and it shall be that everyone who is bitten, when he looks at it, shall live.”
What can the meaning to this possibly be? We learn through analogy. And the analogy of ascending and descending is used quite frequently. So… to look up is to ascend in consciousness and to look down is to descend in consciousness.
Placing the serpent that lives in the dust (lower realm) on a pole is analogous to raising ourselves out of the lower survival realm and “lifting our heads” or ascending into a realm of higher understanding. It is raising our frequency. It is moving out of the realm of duality or lack and realizing that we lack in nothing. We are exhorted in Matthew 6 to take no thought or care for tomorrow.
The idea of taking “no thought” is very interesting because it is the realm of silence. Silence is the backdrop of all frequencies, audible and inaudible. Sound is indecipherable without the backdrop of silence.
“Be still and know that I am God.”
Manifestation exists because of the interaction of silence and sound.
In like manner, the realm of light would not exist without darkness; there would be no backdrop for the stars (light).
“I will give you the treasures of darkness.”
“I form the light and create darkness.”
So… in a nutshell this is what we have learned:
We are whole, harmonious, in rest… We are SOUND doctrine…
(These are all musical terms)
With the information we have gleaned thus far, let’s take another look at what happened in the garden. From previous teaching we understand that the separation of the woman from the man was a separation of energies or frequencies. The female principle (frequency) is separated out from the male principle (frequency) to allow for interaction between the two principles, but always in unity or oneness. It is also known that these principles or energies are within each of us, i.e. yang/yin, drive/receptivity, intellect/emotions, etc.
Returning to the garden we realize that the feminine principle entertained a thought (frequency) that manifested as an intent to receive something that she believed she was lacking in…wisdom. The moment she entertained the thought of lack is the moment she “fell” into the lower dimension of illusion. The Illusion of Lack. She forgot that she was an exact image of God.
Notice that later when the Lord God walked in the garden Adam and his wife heard his SOUND but they hid themselves. They hid because they were now living in the realm of duality. In that realm there are always opposites. Adam now saw himself as separate from his wife; no longer one flesh. When questioned about eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (duality) he replied, “The woman whom You gave to be with me…etc.” He now sees himself as separate from her and tries to place blame. The two principles (frequencies) are now inharmonious.
It is important to realize that we are not talking about a literal garden, but the garden of our mind. The scripture reveals that we are God’s garden and Christ is the husbandman. Disharmony came through the first Adam but harmony came through the second Adam, who restored the remembrance of Christhood to everyone… each in his/her own time. All the fragments are gathered so that nothing is lost… only forgotten for a season.
Now let’s look at the serpent held up on a pole in the wilderness. In Numbers 21 we see the Israelites journeying by the Way of the Red Sea and becoming impatient and discouraged. It is interesting to note that the color red is associated with the base chakra or the survival instinct. When this instinct is separated unto itself and not balanced by the other chakras it is very selfish, fearful, and lustful.
The Israelites now began to speak against God and Moses and fear that they were going to die in the wilderness. Remember, previously, we learned that the sound of the serpent was a hiss, and that meant to entertain thoughts of contempt or scorn for the future. Because of their contempt fiery serpents were sent among them. Eventually though, they repented (changed their minds) and ask that the serpents be taken from them. Moses was then instructed by the Lord to “make a fiery serpent, and set it on a pole; and it shall be that everyone who is bitten, when he looks at it, shall live.”
What can the meaning to this possibly be? We learn through analogy. And the analogy of ascending and descending is used quite frequently. So… to look up is to ascend in consciousness and to look down is to descend in consciousness.
Placing the serpent that lives in the dust (lower realm) on a pole is analogous to raising ourselves out of the lower survival realm and “lifting our heads” or ascending into a realm of higher understanding. It is raising our frequency. It is moving out of the realm of duality or lack and realizing that we lack in nothing. We are exhorted in Matthew 6 to take no thought or care for tomorrow.
The idea of taking “no thought” is very interesting because it is the realm of silence. Silence is the backdrop of all frequencies, audible and inaudible. Sound is indecipherable without the backdrop of silence.
“Be still and know that I am God.”
Manifestation exists because of the interaction of silence and sound.
In like manner, the realm of light would not exist without darkness; there would be no backdrop for the stars (light).
“I will give you the treasures of darkness.”
“I form the light and create darkness.”
So… in a nutshell this is what we have learned:
We are whole, harmonious, in rest… We are SOUND doctrine…
(These are all musical terms)
Interesting Thoughts about Mary Magdalene
The gist of the fictional novel The Da Vinci Code is that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Jesus. Of course, we may never know the truth of that assumption. Throughout the centuries any literature portraying Jesus differently from the canonized version of the Judeo-Christian Bible has been systematically destroyed or suppressed. However, there have been fairly recent discoveries of ancient manuscripts that whet our appetite; namely writings from the Gnostics. Writings such as The Gospel of Thomas, Pistis Sophia, The Gospel of the Egyptians, and The Gospel of Mary portray quite a different atmosphere than the canonized books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
In this short study it is not our intention to compare these books. Instead, it is our intention to ask some simple questions and ponder the answers. If indeed, Da Vinci believed that there was a connection between Jesus and Mary Magdalene (or an unnamed woman), why does the religious system find this so appalling or impossible?
The following quotes are from "Fathers" of the religious system that we have inherited today. These men are venerated in some circles and this is their uptake on women...
Martin Luther: "Women are on earth to bear children. if they die in child-bearing, it matters not; that is all they are here to do."
Tertullion: "And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert-that is, death-even the Son of God had to die."
St. Augustine: "What is the difference whether it is in a wife or a mother, it is still Eve the temptress that we must beware of in any woman......I fail to see what use woman can be to man, if one excludes the function of bearing children."
Appalling as these quotes are, their very essence has pervaded the religious system. Eve and the apple are a constant joke; but the underlying current that survives is that the misery of humanity can be laid at the door of the woman. She is the first-cause. When viewed in this manner it is understandable that the religious system would reject any connection of Jesus to a relationship as intimate as marriage.
There has been a paradigm shift in recent years, however, that accepts the fact that female disciples held positions of authority in the early church. Fundamental mainline religions are fighting this tooth and nail because acceptance of this would allow women into the governmental structure. Decisions would be made with the input of the feminine energy or perspective; quite different from masculine energy. Decision making would become a cooperation of the two energies.
As slow as the process may be, accepting women into heretofore forbidden areas is now a given. But accepting that Jesus may have been married is not. Let's look at why this is so. Marriage indicates physical intimacy between the masculine and the feminine. Anything reeking of a sexual nature is completely taboo where Jesus is concerned. He was born of a virgin and he is married to the church in spirit. Any physical union with a physical woman is just not possible, and, of course, this has to be true when woman is viewed as the first-cause of suffering. In the Judeo-Christian Bible she is "unclean" if she is menstruating, she is the temptress that caused the fall of humanity, she is the property of her husband to be governed totally by him. There is a set of rules for men and a set of rules for women; with women being treated as "second class citizens." Rabbis would actually pray and thank God that they were not "born a woman." It does not take a genius to perceive that there is something wrong with this picture.
With this viewpoint it is easy to understand why any notion of Jesus being married is rejected. For him, who is perfection personified, to have an intimate relationship with such a wanton and fallen creature as a woman, would raise her status and shake the unjust balance of male dominance.
In summary, let us ask this question. Would Jesus be less Divine if he had a wife? If the answer is yes, then the deduction is that he is tainted by the woman. She would have the power to make him "not Divine." If the answer is no, then the deduction is that he embraced his humanity, had an intimate relationship with a woman, perhaps fathered children, and restored woman to her rightful place as co-creator. Jesus was a new breed. When he taught he refuted the traditions passed from generation to generation by proclaiming, "You have heard..., but I say..."
In this short study it is not our intention to compare these books. Instead, it is our intention to ask some simple questions and ponder the answers. If indeed, Da Vinci believed that there was a connection between Jesus and Mary Magdalene (or an unnamed woman), why does the religious system find this so appalling or impossible?
The following quotes are from "Fathers" of the religious system that we have inherited today. These men are venerated in some circles and this is their uptake on women...
Martin Luther: "Women are on earth to bear children. if they die in child-bearing, it matters not; that is all they are here to do."
Tertullion: "And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert-that is, death-even the Son of God had to die."
St. Augustine: "What is the difference whether it is in a wife or a mother, it is still Eve the temptress that we must beware of in any woman......I fail to see what use woman can be to man, if one excludes the function of bearing children."
Appalling as these quotes are, their very essence has pervaded the religious system. Eve and the apple are a constant joke; but the underlying current that survives is that the misery of humanity can be laid at the door of the woman. She is the first-cause. When viewed in this manner it is understandable that the religious system would reject any connection of Jesus to a relationship as intimate as marriage.
There has been a paradigm shift in recent years, however, that accepts the fact that female disciples held positions of authority in the early church. Fundamental mainline religions are fighting this tooth and nail because acceptance of this would allow women into the governmental structure. Decisions would be made with the input of the feminine energy or perspective; quite different from masculine energy. Decision making would become a cooperation of the two energies.
As slow as the process may be, accepting women into heretofore forbidden areas is now a given. But accepting that Jesus may have been married is not. Let's look at why this is so. Marriage indicates physical intimacy between the masculine and the feminine. Anything reeking of a sexual nature is completely taboo where Jesus is concerned. He was born of a virgin and he is married to the church in spirit. Any physical union with a physical woman is just not possible, and, of course, this has to be true when woman is viewed as the first-cause of suffering. In the Judeo-Christian Bible she is "unclean" if she is menstruating, she is the temptress that caused the fall of humanity, she is the property of her husband to be governed totally by him. There is a set of rules for men and a set of rules for women; with women being treated as "second class citizens." Rabbis would actually pray and thank God that they were not "born a woman." It does not take a genius to perceive that there is something wrong with this picture.
With this viewpoint it is easy to understand why any notion of Jesus being married is rejected. For him, who is perfection personified, to have an intimate relationship with such a wanton and fallen creature as a woman, would raise her status and shake the unjust balance of male dominance.
In summary, let us ask this question. Would Jesus be less Divine if he had a wife? If the answer is yes, then the deduction is that he is tainted by the woman. She would have the power to make him "not Divine." If the answer is no, then the deduction is that he embraced his humanity, had an intimate relationship with a woman, perhaps fathered children, and restored woman to her rightful place as co-creator. Jesus was a new breed. When he taught he refuted the traditions passed from generation to generation by proclaiming, "You have heard..., but I say..."
Closer look at the Painting of the Last Supper
THIS QUOTE IS FROM DA VINCI HIMSELF FROM THE BOOK, The Notebooks of Leonardo DaVinci, Edited by Edward MacCurdy Page 863
"How women should be represented in modest attitudes with legs close together, arms folded, and with their heads low and bending sideways."
"How women should be represented in modest attitudes with legs close together, arms folded, and with their heads low and bending sideways."
|
|
Questions to Ponder
- Why am I here?
- What happens when I die?
- Do other dimensions with rational beings exist?
- Is there such a thing as reincarnation?
- Why does the subatomic realm behave differently than the Newtonian realm?
- Can a person be healed by inputting certain frequencies into his spirit/soul/body?
- Was Mars once inhabited?
- Do the Egyptian Pyramids contain unbelievable secrets waiting to be revealed?
- Who were the Olmecs?
- Who or what is creating crop circles?